ISic002133: Fragmentary Latin inscription

No image available

ID
ISic002133
Language
Latin
Status
draft
Text type
Honorific
Object type
plaque

Edition

Loading...

Apparatus criticus

  • Text after Gammella;
  • 1: Gammella reads: M(arcus) · PetÌ£-; although the M may be considered certain, the following three letters are very closely spaced and it seems impossible to be certain of the reading.
  • 2: Gammella reads: [--]us fe-

Physical description

Support

Description
A fragment of a thin white marble plaque, seemingly broken on all sides, and worked flat (but not smooth) on the reverse.
Object type
plaque
Object condition
fragment
Dimensions
height: 7.5 cm, width: 7.8 cm, depth: 1.2 cm

Material

Description
marble
Type > subtype
stone.marble > unverified

Inscription

Layout
The remains of two lines of Latin letters visible, with vacats at the end of both lines
Text condition
incomplete
Technique
chiselled
Pigment
No data
Lettering

Relatively tall and narrow letters, with serifs formed by simple extension of strokes, or by thin cross strokes on M and S. Both M and V appear relatively broad.

Letter heights
Lines 1-2: 25mm
Interlinear heights
Line 1-2: 15mm

Provenance

Place of origin
Agrigentum
Provenance found
Found during excavation of a trench (EK2) on the southern terrace of the ekklesiasterion at Poggio S. Nicola, in a layer of collapse (US2003), in a structure abandoned around the C4 CE, with final collapse between C4 and C6/7 CE
Map

Current location

Place
Agrigento, Sicilia
Repository
Museo Regionale Archeologico Pietro Griffo
Autopsy
No autopsy
Map

Date

later 2nd or earlier 3rd century CE (Gammella on palaeographic grounds) (AD 151 - AD 250)
Evidence
lettering

Text type

Honorific

commentary

Gammella interprets as probably a Severan period honorific, given the use of marble and the findspot in the vicinity of the principal public spaces of the city. This seems likely, although such a plaque could also be from a funerary text; but the findspot, albeit seemingly in secondary deposition, encourages the reading as a public text. For the archaeological context, see Rignanese, Giuseppe, and Federico Figura, ‘5. Agrigento. Lo scavo nella terrazza meridionale dell’ekklesiasterion (Saggio EK2)’, ANNALI SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE - CLASSE DI LETTERE E FILOSOFIA, 30 December 2025, pp. 82–104, doi:10.2422/3035-3769.202502_s06. The reading of both lines would seem to be far from certain, with E and F not readily distinguishable, and the lower portions of E, F, T, L,. P and I all sharing considerable similarities in texts of this date. The absence of an interpunct in line 2, while hardly definitive, further complicates the reading with the vacat at the end, and other interpretations are possible (such as f(ilius) f(ecit) or v(otum) s(olvit) fe(liciter)).

Bibliography

Digital editions
  • TM: -
  • EDR: -
  • EDH: -
  • EDCS: -
  • PHI: -
Printed editions
  • Gammella (2025) at 134-145

Citation and editorial status

Editor
Jonathan Prag
Principal contributor
Jonathan Prag
Contributors
Last revision
5/4/2026