ISic001950: Fragmentary list of names
Edition
Apparatus criticus
- Text of Vinci 2022, controlled against photograph (addition of underdots and vacats)
Physical description
Support
- Description
- Fragment of the right side of a stele of local limestone. The right margin only is preserved, broken on the other three sides. The right margin is bevelled, i.e. cut back at an angle from the front face.
- Object type
- stele
- Object condition
- fragment
- Dimensions
- height: 38 cm, width: 24 cm, depth: 9 cm
Material
- Description
- limestone
- Type > subtype
- stone.calcarenite > unspecified
Inscription
- Layout
- The right hand end of 16 lines of text preserved, with an irregular margin reflecting the lengths of the individual names.
- Text condition
- incomplete
- Technique
- chiselled
- Pigment
- No data
- Lettering
Plainly cut letters with a fairly square module and of fairly regular height throughout. Straight bar alpha; Epsilon has long horizontals of equal length; theta comparable to omicron (slightly ovoid), with full barkappa has full length arms; Mu has vertical first and last, middle strokes three-quarter length; xsi has three equal length horizontals; rho has small closed eiey; sigma has horizaontal top and bottom; phi has ovoid eye, with tall vertical; omega varies from circular to tear-drop, always closed on a horizontal foot.
- Letter heights
- Line 1-16: 11-16mm
- Interlinear heights
- Interlineation line 1 to 2: mm
Provenance
- Place of origin
- Acrae
- Provenance found
- Found during excavations in 2008-2009 on the mediaeval castle of Palazzolo Acreide, in the proximity of foundations of a building on the summit of the rock, attributed to an extra-mural sanctuary of the Greek period
- Map
Current location
- Place
- Siracusa, Sicilia
- Repository
- Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Siracusa
- Autopsy
- none
- Map
Date
2nd century BCE (200 BC - 101 BC)- Evidence
- lettering
Text type
commentary
One of three fragments found in the area of the mediaeval castle. The three fragments may or may not belong to the same inscription. See also ISic001951 and ISic001952. Differences in palaeography suggest that fragments 1 (ISic001950) and 2 (ISic001951) are separate at least.
Bibliography
- Digital editions
- TM: -
- EDR: -
- EDH: -
- EDCS: -
- PHI: -
- Printed editions
Citation and editorial status
- Editor
- Jonathan Prag
- Principal contributor
- Jonathan Prag
- Contributors
- Last revision
- 7/7/2025